![]() ![]() ![]() The researchers extracted significant statements pertaining to the phenomena from transcriptions.ĥ Example of a study using Colaizzi’s method: ![]() Eighty interviews with 40 women, together with data from nonparticipant observations, were analyzed according to Colaizzi’s method. Van Kaam’s method requires that intersubjective agreement be reached with other expert judges.Ĥ Example of a study using Colaizzi’s method:īondas and Eriksson (2001) studied the lived experiences of pregnancy among Finnish women. His view is that it is inappropriate either to return to participants to validate findings or to use external judges to review the analysis. Giorgi’s analysis relies solely on researchers. Colaizzi’s method, for example, is the only one that calls for a validation of results by returning to study participants. There are, some important differences among these three approaches. Phenomenologists search for common patterns shared by particular instances. The basic outcome of all three methods is the description of the meaning of an experience, often through the identification of essential themes. Three frequently used methods for descriptive phenomenology are the methods of Colaizzi (1978), Giorgi (1985), and Van Kaam (1966), all of whom are from the Duquesne school of phenomenology, based on Husserl’s philosophy. Schools of phenomenology have developed different approaches to data analysis. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |